fix: address code review findings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
|
||||
package routing
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"trip-planner/internal/storage"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func TestFindRouteMaxTransfers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
@@ -40,7 +42,9 @@ func TestFindRouteMaxTransfers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with MaxTransfers=0: should only find the direct route (0 transfers)
|
||||
opts0 := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 0}
|
||||
results0 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts0)
|
||||
closedStations0 := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap0 := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results0 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts0, closedStations0, neighborsMap0)
|
||||
t.Logf("MaxTransfers=0: found %d route(s)", len(results0))
|
||||
for _, r := range results0 {
|
||||
t.Logf(" Route: duration=%d, transfers=%d", r.TotalDuration, r.TotalTransfers)
|
||||
@@ -60,7 +64,9 @@ func TestFindRouteMaxTransfers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with MaxTransfers=1: should find direct route + 1-transfer route if any
|
||||
opts1 := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 1}
|
||||
results1 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts1)
|
||||
closedStations1 := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap1 := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results1 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts1, closedStations1, neighborsMap1)
|
||||
t.Logf("MaxTransfers=1: found %d route(s)", len(results1))
|
||||
for _, r := range results1 {
|
||||
t.Logf(" Route: duration=%d, transfers=%d", r.TotalDuration, r.TotalTransfers)
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +80,9 @@ func TestFindRouteMaxTransfers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with MaxTransfers=2: should find more routes
|
||||
opts2 := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 2}
|
||||
results2 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts2)
|
||||
closedStations2 := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap2 := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results2 := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s6", opts2, closedStations2, neighborsMap2)
|
||||
t.Logf("MaxTransfers=2: found %d route(s)", len(results2))
|
||||
for _, r := range results2 {
|
||||
t.Logf(" Route: duration=%d, transfers=%d", r.TotalDuration, r.TotalTransfers)
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +171,9 @@ func TestParetoFrontGeneration(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("fastest mode (default) sorts by duration", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
opts := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 3}
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts)
|
||||
closedStations := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts, closedStations, neighborsMap)
|
||||
|
||||
// Should find at least some Pareto-optimal routes
|
||||
if len(results) == 0 {
|
||||
@@ -199,7 +209,9 @@ func TestParetoFrontGeneration(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("fewest_transfers mode sorts by transfers first", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
opts := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 3, RankingMode: "fewest_transfers"}
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts)
|
||||
closedStations := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts, closedStations, neighborsMap)
|
||||
|
||||
if len(results) == 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected at least one Pareto-optimal route with fewest_transfers mode")
|
||||
@@ -230,7 +242,9 @@ func TestParetoFrontGeneration(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("cheapest mode sorts by cost first", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
opts := SearchOptions{MaxTransfers: 3, RankingMode: "cheapest"}
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts)
|
||||
closedStations := make(map[string]bool)
|
||||
neighborsMap := make(map[string][]storage.StationNeighbor)
|
||||
results := graph.FindRoutesPareto("s1", "s8", opts, closedStations, neighborsMap)
|
||||
|
||||
if len(results) == 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected at least one Pareto-optimal route with cheapest mode")
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user