6.8 KiB
Lazy Graph Expansion
Overview
Implement lazy (on-demand) graph expansion for trip routing within Yandex.Schedules API quota constraints. Instead of pre-building a complete graph, the routing algorithm will expand the graph on-demand during route search using hub stations and on-demand /search API calls. This enables routing within the API's limited daily quota (hundreds of requests on free tier) while supporting arbitrary depth and multimodal routes.
Problem it solves: Current static graph approach cannot scale beyond MVP depth (1-2 transfers) without exhausting API quota. Lazy expansion allows depth up to 4-5 transfers by only requesting relevant station pairs at each BFS step.
Key benefits:
- API quota protection via on-demand requests only for relevant hub pairs
- Arbitrary transfer depth (4-5 max per specification)
- Automatic fallback to neighboring stations when primary hubs are closed
- Cached results per (from:to:date) with appropriate TTL policies
Context (from discovery)
- Files/components involved:
internal/routing/graph.go,internal/yandex/client.go,internal/cache/store.go - Related patterns: Lazy graph expansion (spec section 7.2), cache-aside pattern, BFS/Dijkstra with depth limiting
- Dependencies: Yandex API rate limiter + circuit breaker (already implemented), Redis cache with TTL policies (already implemented)
- Current state: Static graph built at startup via
BuildGraphFromStations; routing uses pre-built graph with limited depth
Specification reference:
- Section 7.2: "Lazy (lazy) graph expansion with hub stations — BFS/Dijkstra with depth limiting (4-5 transfers max), on-demand /search requests only for relevant station pairs, aggressive caching"
- Roadmap: Etapa 3 — Глубокий поиск и автодетект (Deep search and auto-detection)
Development Approach
- Testing approach: TDD (tests first) — user preference confirmed
- Each task will include new/updated tests as required checklist items
- All tests must pass before starting next task — no exceptions
Testing Strategy
- Unit tests: Required for every task (TDD approach)
- E2E tests: Not applicable for this backend routing change (no UI changes)
- Tests cover both success and error scenarios for all new code paths
Progress Tracking
- Mark completed items with
[x]immediately when done - Add newly discovered tasks with ➕ prefix
- Document issues/blockers with ⚠️ prefix
Implementation Steps
Task 1: Add hub station list and lazy expansion logic to routing graph
- Define hub station selection criteria (population-based + outgoing flights count)
- Add
BuildGraphFromHubsfunction that creates station + city nodes with synthetic edges only - Implement
ExpandGraphLazymethod that on-demand adds edges from current node to hub candidates via /search - Write tests for hub station selection
- Write tests for lazy expansion behavior (on-demand /search calls)
- Run tests - must pass before task 2
Task 2: Integrate Yandex /search for on-demand edge expansion
- Add
SearchRoutesmethod to yandex client for on-demand station pair searches - Implement hub expansion: from current node, call /search to hub stations + nearby stations at destination city
- Add cache key generation for search results:
search:{from}:{to}:{date} - Write tests for on-demand search integration
- Write tests for cache integration with lazy expansion
- Run tests - must pass before task 3
Task 3: Update FindRoute to use lazy expansion with transfer depth limit
- Modify
FindRouteto lazily expand adjacency list during BFS instead of using pre-built edges - Implement transfer depth tracking with max 4-5 transfers limit
- Add MCT calculation during lazy expansion (using existing ApplyMCT logic)
- Write tests for FindRoute with lazy expansion (various transfer counts)
- Write tests for transfer limit enforcement
- Run tests - must pass before task 4
Task 4: Implement cache-aware search results with TTL policies
- Integrate search result caching using existing cache TTL policies (near-term: 2-6h, far-term: 7d)
- Add cache lookup before on-demand /search calls
- Write tests for cache hit/miss with lazy expansion
- Write tests for TTL policy selection based on date distance
- Run tests - must pass before task 5
Task 5: Verify end-to-end lazy routing and update documentation
- Verify all requirements from Overview are implemented
- Verify edge cases: closed station fallback, depth limits, cache behavior
- Run full test suite (unit tests)
- Run linter - all issues must be fixed
- Update this plan file when scope changes during implementation
- Update README.md if new patterns discovered
Task 6: Final verification and plan completion
- Verify all checkboxes marked
- Run final test suite
- ralphex automatically moves plan to `docs/plans/completed/
Technical Details
Data Structures
Hub Station Selection:
- Hubs selected based on: population (million+ cities), number of outgoing Yandex flights
- Pre-computed list or on-demand selection from station directory
Lazy Expansion Flow:
- Start BFS from origin station
- At each step, identify current node's type (station or city hub)
- If station: query /search to hub stations + stations in destination city radius
- If city hub: query /search to station hubs in target city
- Add found edges to adjacency list (with caching)
- Continue BFS with transfer tracking
- Stop at max 4-5 transfers or when destination reached
Cache Keys:
search:{from_station_id}:{to_station_id}:{date}— search results with TTLstation:{station_id}— station directory data (30 days TTL)
Processing Flow
User requests route: Moscow → Simferopol, 2026-08-20
↓
Check cache: search:c146:c213:2026-08-20 → cache hit/miss
↓
If miss: Build initial graph (stations + city hubs, synthetic edges)
↓
BFS from Moscow station:
Step 1: Expand from Moscow → query /search to hub candidates (city hub + nearby stations)
Step 2: For each reached hub, expand further → query /search to next candidates
Step 3: Track transfers, apply MCT at each transfer point
Step 4: Stop at max 5 transfers or when Simferopol station reached
↓
Pareto-rank results (time, transfers, cost)
↓
Return routes + cache results for future searches
Post-Completion
Items requiring manual intervention or external systems - no checkboxes, informational only
Manual verification:
- Test route search with various transfer counts (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
- Verify cache hit/miss behavior for near-term and far-term dates
- Test station closure fallback to neighboring stations
External system updates:
- None for this backend change (routing logic internal to service)